Bangladeshi vs Chinese Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Chinese
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Bangladeshis
Chinese
18.6%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Chinese Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,390,027 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.169 and weighted average of 18.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 16.9%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | Chinese |
| Minimum | 5.8% | 10.5% |
| Maximum | 36.1% | 30.0% |
| Range | 30.3% | 19.5% |
| Mean | 17.9% | 16.3% |
| Median | 18.3% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.9% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.7% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Comanche (18.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Apache (18.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Liberian (18.6%, a difference of 0.12%), African (18.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (18.6%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 18.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (15.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Lithuania (16.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.0%, a difference of 0.59%), Thai (16.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from Ireland (16.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 16.3% |