Immigrants from Congo vs Sioux No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Sioux
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Sioux
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Congo vs Sioux No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,060,649 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.198 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,693,165 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 0.11%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Congo | Sioux |
| Minimum | 0.81% | 0.66% |
| Maximum | 31.7% | 44.7% |
| Range | 30.9% | 44.0% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 12.4% |
| Median | 9.2% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 18.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo and Sioux by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Tlingit-Haida (10.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Colombian (10.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Tlingit-Haida (10.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Colombian (10.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
| New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |