New Zealander vs Sioux No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
New Zealander
Sioux
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
New Zealanders
Sioux
10.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
65.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Sioux No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,783,580 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,693,165 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 1.2%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | New Zealander | Sioux |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.66% |
| Maximum | 19.1% | 44.7% |
| Range | 17.7% | 44.0% |
| Mean | 5.9% | 12.4% |
| Median | 4.7% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 18.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and Sioux by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Middle Africa (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Austria (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cambodia (10.2%, a difference of 0.21%), South African (10.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and Comanche (10.2%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Tlingit-Haida (10.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Congo (10.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and Colombian (10.0%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
| New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
| South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |
| Comanche | 60.8 /100 | #165 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 60.5 /100 | #166 | Good 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 58.8 /100 | #167 | Average 10.3% |