Immigrants from England vs Osage No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Osage
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from England
Osage
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Osage No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 390,853,276 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.755 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,756,472 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 0.12%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from England | Osage |
Minimum | 3.0% | 0.66% |
Maximum | 38.3% | 13.3% |
Range | 35.3% | 12.7% |
Mean | 10.2% | 5.6% |
Median | 7.5% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 7.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England and Osage by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Bangladeshi (8.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Cuba (8.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Lebanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.33%), Bhutanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Jordan (8.7%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Cuba (8.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Bhutanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Bangladeshi (8.7%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Germany (8.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Canada (8.7%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | North America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Potawatomi | 98.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 98.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.9% |