Jordanian vs Osage No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Jordanian
Osage
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Jordanians
Osage
8.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Osage No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,331,482 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,756,472 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 1.9%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian | Osage |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.66% |
| Maximum | 13.9% | 13.3% |
| Range | 12.5% | 12.7% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 5.6% |
| Median | 5.8% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Osage by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Cuban (8.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Iranian (8.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and Portuguese (8.6%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Cuba (8.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Bhutanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Bangladeshi (8.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Germany (8.7%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |