Immigrants from England vs Slavic No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Slavic
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from England
Slavs
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Slavic No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 390,853,276 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.755 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,391,797 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108 and weighted average of 9.0%, a difference of 3.1%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from England | Slavic |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 0.74% |
| Maximum | 38.3% | 15.4% |
| Range | 35.3% | 14.7% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 5.8% |
| Median | 7.5% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England and Slavs by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Bangladeshi (8.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Cuba (8.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Lebanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and Bhutanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Bulgarian (9.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Asian (9.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Pakistani (9.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Central America (8.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Yugoslavian (9.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Potawatomi | 98.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 98.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Slavs | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Bulgarians | 98.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Asians | 98.3 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Pakistanis | 98.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 98.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 9.0% |