Immigrants from England vs Osage 1 or more Vehicles in Household

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,777,115 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315 and weighted average of 91.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,799,602 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197 and weighted average of 91.4%, a difference of 0.050%.

1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from England	Osage
Minimum	76.1%	86.7%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	23.9%	13.3%
Mean	95.9%	95.2%
Median	96.1%	95.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	93.6%	93.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	100.0%	97.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.4%	4.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.8%	3.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.8%	3.3%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England and Osage by 1 or more Vehicles in Household

In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Lebanese (91.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (91.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Jordanian (91.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Tsimshian (91.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Bolivian (91.5%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Germany (91.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American (91.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Bangladeshi (91.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Tsimshian (91.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Canada (91.4%, a difference of 0.020%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	1 or more Vehicles in Household
Immigrants \| Lebanon	99.6 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 91.6%
Portuguese	99.5 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 91.6%
Cubans	99.5 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 91.5%
Immigrants \| Philippines	99.4 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 91.5%
Iranians	99.4 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 91.5%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	99.4 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 91.5%
Bolivians	99.4 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 91.5%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	99.3 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 91.4%
Lebanese	99.3 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| England	99.3 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 91.4%
Jordanians	99.3 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 91.4%
Tsimshian	99.3 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 91.4%
Osage	99.2 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| Germany	99.2 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 91.4%
Spanish Americans	99.2 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 91.4%
Bangladeshis	99.2 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| Canada	99.2 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| Jordan	99.2 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 91.4%
Bhutanese	99.2 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| North America	99.2 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| Cuba	99.1 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 91.3%