Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Asia No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Immigrants from Asia
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from England
Immigrants from Asia
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
21.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Asia No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 390,853,276 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.755 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 545,313,645 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 25.1%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from England | Immigrants from Asia |
Minimum | 3.0% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 38.3% | 52.4% |
Range | 35.3% | 50.5% |
Mean | 10.2% | 10.9% |
Median | 7.5% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 11.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 8.9% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Bangladeshi (8.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Cuba (8.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Lebanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and Bhutanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | North America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Asia by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Immigrants from Sweden (10.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Cambodian (10.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Western Europe (10.9%, a difference of 0.44%), Shoshone (10.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and Central American (10.8%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Carpatho Rusyns | 32.1 /100 | #192 | Fair 10.7% |
Ukrainians | 28.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 10.7% |
Pueblo | 27.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 26.3 /100 | #195 | Fair 10.8% |
Central Americans | 24.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 10.8% |
Shoshone | 24.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 22.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 21.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 10.9% |
Cambodians | 19.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 10.9% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 19.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 10.9% |
Romanians | 17.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 10.9% |
Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |
Guatemalans | 16.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.0% |
Somalis | 15.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.0% |