Portuguese vs Osage No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Portuguese
Osage
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Portuguese
Osage
8.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese vs Osage No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,384,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,756,472 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 1.4%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Portuguese | Osage |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.66% |
| Maximum | 21.5% | 13.3% |
| Range | 20.4% | 12.7% |
| Mean | 8.1% | 5.6% |
| Median | 7.3% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Portuguese and Osage by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Bolivian (8.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Iranian (8.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Tsimshian (8.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Philippines (8.5%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Cuba (8.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Bhutanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Bangladeshi (8.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Germany (8.7%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.7% |