Burmese vs Syrian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Burmese
Syrian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Burmese
Syrians
9.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
88.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Syrian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,501,030 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.116 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 265,903,344 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Syrians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.369 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 0.60%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Syrian |
| Minimum | 0.54% | 0.29% |
| Maximum | 28.5% | 23.8% |
| Range | 28.0% | 23.5% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 6.4% |
| Median | 7.0% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Syrians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from the Azores (9.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Nicaraguan (9.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Syria (9.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Kenyan (9.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Kenya (9.6%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Immigrants from Oceania (9.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Kenyan (9.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from the Azores (9.7%, a difference of 0.39%), Latvian (9.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from South Africa (9.8%, a difference of 0.63%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Costa Ricans | 92.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Blackfeet | 91.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 90.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 90.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |