Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Indian (Asian) Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Indian (Asian)
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Indians (Asian)
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
85.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Indian (Asian) Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,603,268 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 491,024,006 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.104 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.090%.

Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sri Lanka | Indian (Asian) |
Minimum | 0.70% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 12.4% | 7.6% |
Range | 11.7% | 4.8% |
Mean | 4.9% | 5.0% |
Median | 4.9% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 5.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 0.98% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 0.84% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 0.84% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Indians (Asian) by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Maltese (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Chickasaw (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.2 /100 | #124 | Excellent 5.1% |
Basques | 86.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 86.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 86.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 85.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.1% |
Maltese | 85.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |