Immigrants from Italy vs Indian (Asian) Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
Indian (Asian)
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
Indians (Asian)
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
75.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs Indian (Asian) Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,110,337 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.623 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 491,024,006 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.104 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.88%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | Indian (Asian) |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 23.1% | 7.6% |
| Range | 21.1% | 4.8% |
| Mean | 8.8% | 5.0% |
| Median | 5.7% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 0.98% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 0.84% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 0.84% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy and Indians (Asian) by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Immigrants from Greece (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from China (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chickasaw (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 74.9 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
| South Africans | 70.8 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |