Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Egyptian Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Egyptian
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Egyptians
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
85.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
78.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Egyptian Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,603,268 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,383,478 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.175 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.69%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sri Lanka | Egyptian |
| Minimum | 0.70% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 12.4% | 9.8% |
| Range | 11.7% | 8.6% |
| Mean | 4.9% | 4.7% |
| Median | 4.9% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Egyptians by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |