Asian vs Indian (Asian) Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Asian
Indian (Asian)
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Asians
Indians (Asian)
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
78.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Asian vs Indian (Asian) Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 542,084,939 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Asians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 491,024,006 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.104 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.59%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Asian | Indian (Asian) |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 9.9% | 7.6% |
| Range | 7.9% | 4.8% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 5.0% |
| Median | 5.0% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.72% | 0.98% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.94% | 0.84% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.94% | 0.84% |
Demographics Similar to Asians and Indians (Asian) by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |