Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Norway Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Immigrants from Norway
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Immigrants from Norway
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
79.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Norway Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,623,871 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.041 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,500,173 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.724 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.57%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from Norway |
Minimum | 0.90% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 13.8% | 57.1% |
Range | 12.9% | 56.6% |
Mean | 5.0% | 7.8% |
Median | 4.9% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 5.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Norway by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Ethiopians | 85.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.1% |
Maltese | 85.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |