Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Korea Unemployment
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Korea
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Korea
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Korea Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,562,181 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 415,935,417 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.084 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 0.96%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Korea |
| Minimum | 0.50% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 17.6% | 11.2% |
| Range | 17.1% | 9.7% |
| Mean | 5.6% | 5.0% |
| Median | 4.8% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Korea by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Osage (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Maltese (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), American (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Estonian (5.0%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Korea are Immigrants from Moldova (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Jordanian (5.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (5.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from South Africa (5.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Hungarians | 96.9 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 96.6 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 96.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Jordanians | 96.4 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 96.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 96.3 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Ukrainians | 96.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 95.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 95.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 95.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Romanians | 95.0 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 94.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Estonians | 94.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Americans | 94.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 94.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Chickasaw | 94.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Osage | 94.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Maltese | 94.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.0% |