Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Eritrea Unemployment
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Eritrea
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Eritrea
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Eritrea Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,562,181 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,849,484 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 0.19%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Eritrea |
| Minimum | 0.50% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 17.6% | 9.2% |
| Range | 17.1% | 8.7% |
| Mean | 5.6% | 4.4% |
| Median | 4.8% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eritrea by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Osage (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Maltese (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Romania (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and American (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eritrea are Immigrants from Lithuania (5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Chilean (5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Turkey (5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Romania (5.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Immigrants | England | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 95.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Romanians | 95.0 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 94.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Estonians | 94.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Americans | 94.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 94.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Chickasaw | 94.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Osage | 94.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Maltese | 94.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 93.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 93.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 93.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Chileans | 93.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| South Africans | 92.6 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Argentineans | 92.4 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 92.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 91.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 91.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.1% |