Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,562,181 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,397,412 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 0.34%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Minimum | 0.50% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 17.6% | 48.1% |
| Range | 17.1% | 47.7% |
| Mean | 5.6% | 6.2% |
| Median | 4.8% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Osage (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Maltese (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Romania (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and American (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from England (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Estonian (5.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Serbia (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 96.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 96.3 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Ukrainians | 96.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 95.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 95.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 95.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Romanians | 95.0 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 94.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Estonians | 94.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Americans | 94.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 94.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Chickasaw | 94.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Osage | 94.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Maltese | 94.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 93.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 93.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 93.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.0% |