Asian vs Argentinean Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Asian
Argentinean
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Asians
Argentineans
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
78.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
79.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Asian vs Argentinean Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 542,084,939 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Asians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,580,968 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.053 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.080%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Asian | Argentinean |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 9.9% | 16.2% |
| Range | 7.9% | 15.2% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 5.1% |
| Median | 5.0% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.72% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.94% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.94% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Asians and Argentineans by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 74.9 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
| South Africans | 70.8 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 70.0 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 69.6 /100 | #156 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 5.2% |
| Albanians | 68.3 /100 | #158 | Good 5.2% |