White/Caucasian vs West Indian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
West Indian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
West Indians
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs West Indian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,395,051 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.494 and weighted average of 22.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,099,029 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of West Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.266 and weighted average of 22.3%, a difference of 1.8%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | White/Caucasian | West Indian |
Minimum | 18.3% | 7.2% |
Maximum | 38.3% | 52.4% |
Range | 20.0% | 45.1% |
Mean | 24.3% | 21.3% |
Median | 24.0% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.6% | 13.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.4% | 24.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians and West Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Celtic (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are Immigrants from Middle Africa (22.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (22.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Bermudan (22.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Cape Verdean (22.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Liberian (22.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Cape Verdeans | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 22.3% |
Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |