Welsh vs Palestinian Poverty
COMPARE
Welsh
Palestinian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Welsh
Palestinians
11.6%
POVERTY
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Welsh vs Palestinian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 528,094,274 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,388,270 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.090%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Welsh | Palestinian |
| Minimum | 5.9% | 0.32% |
| Maximum | 55.5% | 25.3% |
| Range | 49.6% | 25.0% |
| Mean | 16.0% | 10.8% |
| Median | 11.8% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.8% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Welsh and Palestinians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.060%), French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |