Paraguayan vs Palestinian Poverty
COMPARE
Paraguayan
Palestinian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Paraguayans
Palestinians
11.4%
POVERTY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Paraguayan vs Palestinian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,102,151 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Paraguayans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,388,270 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Paraguayan | Palestinian |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.32% |
| Maximum | 21.1% | 25.3% |
| Range | 19.6% | 25.0% |
| Mean | 9.4% | 10.8% |
| Median | 9.4% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Paraguayans and Palestinians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Paraguayans are Australian (11.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Romanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), British (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |