Welsh vs Immigrants from Hungary Poverty
COMPARE
Welsh
Immigrants from Hungary
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Welsh
Immigrants from Hungary
11.6%
POVERTY
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
POVERTY
88.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Welsh vs Immigrants from Hungary Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 528,094,274 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,671,774 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 0.85%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Welsh | Immigrants from Hungary |
| Minimum | 5.9% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 55.5% | 33.5% |
| Range | 49.6% | 31.9% |
| Mean | 16.0% | 9.8% |
| Median | 11.8% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.8% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Welsh and Immigrants from Hungary by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are New Zealander (11.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Puget Sound Salish (11.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Soviet Union (11.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (11.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (11.7%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
| New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |