Scottish vs Palestinian Poverty
COMPARE
Scottish
Palestinian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Scottish
Palestinians
11.5%
POVERTY
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scottish vs Palestinian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,309,495 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.670 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,388,270 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.88%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scottish | Palestinian |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 0.32% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 25.3% |
| Range | 98.1% | 25.0% |
| Mean | 20.9% | 10.8% |
| Median | 12.6% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.9% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.4% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.3% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish and Palestinians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Immigrants from Indonesia (11.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (11.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and Slavic (11.5%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |