Ute vs Hopi Male Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Hopi
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Ute
Hopi
16.2%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Hopi Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,650,694 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.614 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,731,622 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hopi and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.239 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 28.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Hopi |
| Minimum | 3.5% | 9.5% |
| Maximum | 59.1% | 69.5% |
| Range | 55.6% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 23.3% | 28.5% |
| Median | 17.9% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.9% | 37.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.0% | 20.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.6% | 14.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.3% | 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Hopi by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (16.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Dominican (16.1%, a difference of 0.99%), Black/African American (15.8%, a difference of 2.7%), Paiute (15.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and Houma (16.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hopi are Yup'ik (20.4%, a difference of 2.1%), Pima (20.4%, a difference of 2.2%), Lumbee (20.2%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (20.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and Puerto Rican (22.0%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 20.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 20.4% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 22.9% |