Potawatomi vs Osage Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Potawatomi
Osage
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Potawatomi
Osage
10.8%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
62.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
82.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Potawatomi vs Osage Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,657,518 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,738,708 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 2.4%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Potawatomi | Osage |
Minimum | 1.9% | 0.89% |
Maximum | 55.0% | 22.5% |
Range | 53.1% | 21.6% |
Mean | 13.2% | 9.9% |
Median | 11.6% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.6% | 13.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Demographics Similar to Potawatomi by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Malaysian (10.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Tsimshian (10.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Indonesia (10.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Alaska Native (10.8%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.9 /100 | #157 | Good 10.7% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 71.7 /100 | #158 | Good 10.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.8 /100 | #159 | Good 10.7% |
Sudanese | 68.2 /100 | #160 | Good 10.7% |
Arabs | 65.2 /100 | #161 | Good 10.8% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 64.8 /100 | #162 | Good 10.8% |
Tsimshian | 64.5 /100 | #163 | Good 10.8% |
Potawatomi | 62.6 /100 | #164 | Good 10.8% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 10.8% |
Malaysians | 62.0 /100 | #166 | Good 10.8% |
Alaska Natives | 60.3 /100 | #167 | Good 10.8% |
Mongolians | 58.0 /100 | #168 | Average 10.9% |
Sri Lankans | 56.8 /100 | #169 | Average 10.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 55.8 /100 | #170 | Average 10.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 55.1 /100 | #171 | Average 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Osage by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (10.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Portuguese (10.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Latvia (10.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Asia (10.6%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Immigrants | Norway | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 86.4 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 85.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 84.7 /100 | #138 | Excellent 10.5% |
Portuguese | 84.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 83.4 /100 | #140 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Europe | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 10.5% |
Osage | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Asia | 80.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.6% |
Iraqis | 80.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.6% |
Laotians | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 10.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Greece | 79.0 /100 | #147 | Good 10.6% |
Americans | 78.1 /100 | #148 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 78.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.6% |