Turkish vs New Zealander Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Turkish
New Zealander
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Turks
New Zealanders
10.0%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
76th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs New Zealander Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,163,307 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.216 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,818,683 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.213 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 0.14%.

Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | New Zealander |
Minimum | 3.5% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 20.6% | 19.5% |
Range | 17.1% | 17.6% |
Mean | 8.8% | 8.0% |
Median | 8.5% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 10.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and New Zealanders by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Russian (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (10.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Yugoslavian (10.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Samoan (10.0%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from South Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Russian (10.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Palestinian (10.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and Yugoslavian (10.0%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Pennsylvania Germans | 98.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Canadians | 98.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Australians | 98.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Samoans | 98.0 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Yugoslavians | 97.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Palestinians | 97.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Russians | 97.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Turks | 97.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.8 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.0% |
New Zealanders | 97.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 97.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 97.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 97.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Koreans | 97.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 97.3 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 97.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.1% |