Turkish vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from China
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from China
14.6%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,582,938 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.426 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 433,139,374 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 7.0%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 0.87% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 35.3% |
| Range | 99.1% | 32.4% |
| Mean | 20.7% | 11.9% |
| Median | 12.7% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.3% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.4% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.7% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.3% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Maltese (14.5%, a difference of 0.34%), Latvian (14.5%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Moldova (14.5%, a difference of 0.42%), Taiwanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (14.4%, a difference of 0.82%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Ireland (13.7%, a difference of 0.88%), Immigrants from Japan (13.8%, a difference of 1.3%), Bolivian (13.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (13.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Asians | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Koreans | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 14.6% |