Maltese vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Maltese
Immigrants from China
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Maltese
Immigrants from China
14.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,026,696 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 433,139,374 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 6.7%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Maltese | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 5.2% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 28.2% | 35.3% |
Range | 23.0% | 32.4% |
Mean | 14.7% | 11.9% |
Median | 13.2% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 13.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Maltese and Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Latvian (14.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Moldova (14.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Taiwanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Turkish (14.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (14.4%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Ireland (13.7%, a difference of 0.88%), Immigrants from Japan (13.8%, a difference of 1.3%), Bolivian (13.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (13.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Asians | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Koreans | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 14.6% |