Turkish vs Immigrants from China Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from China
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from China
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from China Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,856,342 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,042,790 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 0.050%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 3.2% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 31.8% | 32.2% |
| Range | 28.5% | 29.4% |
| Mean | 15.5% | 16.0% |
| Median | 15.5% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.1% | 17.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Immigrants from China by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Portuguese (16.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (16.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Scandinavian (16.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Scottish (16.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and European (17.0%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Scottish (16.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (16.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Portuguese (16.9%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (16.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Scandinavian (16.9%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.2 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.1 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Yup'ik | 96.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Inupiat | 96.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 96.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 96.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| South Africans | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Scottish | 95.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 94.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Portuguese | 94.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Turks | 94.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Scandinavians | 94.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Europeans | 93.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Nicaraguans | 93.0 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 92.9 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 17.0% |