Turkish vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from China
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from China
13.4%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,836,964 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,826,325 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 0.72%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 0.17% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 57.0% | 29.3% |
| Range | 56.9% | 27.7% |
| Mean | 11.2% | 11.7% |
| Median | 10.2% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Danish (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Tongan (13.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Swedish (13.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and Asian (13.5%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Bolivian (13.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Swedish (13.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Eastern European (13.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and Latvian (13.2%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Asians | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.6% |