South American vs Luxembourger Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
South American
Luxembourger
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
South Americans
Luxembourgers
16.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
67.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Luxembourger Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 481,449,574 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.169 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,903,603 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 13.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 0.69% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 34.5% | 33.3% |
Range | 33.8% | 32.0% |
Mean | 15.2% | 11.9% |
Median | 15.1% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 15.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to South Americans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Germany (16.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Colombia (16.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (16.1%, a difference of 0.16%), French Canadian (16.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Uruguayan (16.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 64.0 /100 | #171 | Good 16.2% |
Afghans | 62.3 /100 | #172 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | South America | 55.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Italian (14.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Estonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Romania (14.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |