South African vs French Family Poverty
COMPARE
South African
French
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
South Africans
French
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
92.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs French Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,354,069 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.807 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 567,554,801 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514 and weighted average of 8.3%, a difference of 0.33%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | French |
Minimum | 2.1% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 30.8% | 82.4% |
Range | 28.7% | 80.9% |
Mean | 7.0% | 13.4% |
Median | 6.0% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and French by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Israel (8.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Russia (8.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Europe (8.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (8.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and Canadian (8.2%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French are Immigrants from Western Europe (8.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Russia (8.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Israel (8.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Egypt (8.3%, a difference of 0.56%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (8.2%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | France | 94.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Canadians | 94.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |
South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |