South African vs Soviet Union Family Poverty
COMPARE
South African
Soviet Union
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
South Africans
Soviet Union
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
90.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Soviet Union Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,354,069 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.807 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,439,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163 and weighted average of 8.3%, a difference of 1.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African | Soviet Union |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 0.36% |
| Maximum | 30.8% | 18.3% |
| Range | 28.7% | 18.0% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 6.5% |
| Median | 6.0% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Soviet Union by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Israel (8.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Russia (8.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Europe (8.2%, a difference of 0.26%), French (8.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (8.2%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Pakistani (8.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Palestinian (8.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Paraguayan (8.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Native Hawaiian (8.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Icelander (8.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | France | 94.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Canadians | 94.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |