Serbian vs Portuguese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Serbian
Portuguese
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Serbians
Portuguese
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
90.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Serbian vs Portuguese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 265,642,199 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.609 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 444,338,613 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 1.9%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Serbian | Portuguese |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 43.1% |
| Range | 98.4% | 42.1% |
| Mean | 18.9% | 16.1% |
| Median | 12.0% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.2% | 19.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.4% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.1% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Serbians and Portuguese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Chilean (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (14.9%, a difference of 0.22%), English (14.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and Immigrants from Denmark (14.9%, a difference of 0.58%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Czechoslovakian (15.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Pakistani (15.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.0%, a difference of 0.63%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Serbians | 94.5 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Chileans | 94.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Jordanians | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| English | 93.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Irish | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Belgians | 93.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 93.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 93.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 92.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Portuguese | 90.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.1% |