Chilean vs Portuguese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Chilean
Portuguese
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Chileans
Portuguese
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
90.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Portuguese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 255,499,348 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 444,338,613 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 1.8%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean | Portuguese |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 57.2% | 43.1% |
| Range | 54.6% | 42.1% |
| Mean | 15.3% | 16.1% |
| Median | 13.1% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.8% | 19.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.5% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Portuguese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Serbian (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Tlingit-Haida (14.9%, a difference of 0.16%), English (14.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Denmark (14.9%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Czechoslovakian (15.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Pakistani (15.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.0%, a difference of 0.63%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Serbians | 94.5 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Chileans | 94.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Jordanians | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| English | 93.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Irish | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Belgians | 93.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 93.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 93.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 92.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Portuguese | 90.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.1% |