Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Osage Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,797,155 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.225 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,492,643 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 38.6%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Eastern Asia	Osage
Minimum	2.5%	6.7%
Maximum	42.3%	67.2%
Range	39.8%	60.5%
Mean	12.0%	21.1%
Median	11.1%	19.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.5%	14.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	13.9%	24.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.5%	10.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.9%	11.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.9%	11.4%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia are Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from China (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Japan (13.3%, a difference of 0.58%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Bulgarians	99.9 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 13.1%
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.7%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.7%

Demographics Similar to Osage by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Cree (18.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.43%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Armenia	2.9 /100 \| #223	Tragic 18.1%
Bermudans	2.8 /100 \| #224	Tragic 18.1%
Immigrants \| Africa	2.7 /100 \| #225	Tragic 18.2%
Nicaraguans	2.4 /100 \| #226	Tragic 18.2%
Immigrants \| Nonimmigrants	2.0 /100 \| #227	Tragic 18.3%
Alaskan Athabascans	2.0 /100 \| #228	Tragic 18.3%
Ghanaians	1.4 /100 \| #229	Tragic 18.5%
Osage	1.3 /100 \| #230	Tragic 18.5%
Cree	1.3 /100 \| #231	Tragic 18.5%
Immigrants \| Sudan	1.1 /100 \| #232	Tragic 18.6%
Sudanese	1.1 /100 \| #233	Tragic 18.6%
Fijians	1.1 /100 \| #234	Tragic 18.6%
Nepalese	1.1 /100 \| #235	Tragic 18.6%
Alsatians	1.1 /100 \| #236	Tragic 18.6%
Immigrants \| Nigeria	1.0 /100 \| #237	Tragic 18.6%