Australian vs Osage Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Australian
Osage
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Australians
Osage
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Osage Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,150,197 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.510 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,492,643 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 25.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Australian | Osage |
Minimum | 5.3% | 6.7% |
Maximum | 60.2% | 67.2% |
Range | 54.9% | 60.5% |
Mean | 19.5% | 21.1% |
Median | 15.3% | 19.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.4% | 24.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.7% | 10.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 11.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Australians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Swiss (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Soviet Union (14.8%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Demographics Similar to Osage by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Cree (18.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |