Pakistani vs Immigrants from Norway Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 334,315,212 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.363 and weighted average of 10.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,590,861 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.321 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 1.4%.

Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Pakistani	Immigrants from Norway
Minimum	1.2%	0.71%
Maximum	30.9%	13.4%
Range	29.7%	12.7%
Mean	11.8%	7.4%
Median	10.0%	7.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.0%	5.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	14.4%	10.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.4%	4.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.9%	3.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.9%	3.7%

Demographics Similar to Pakistanis and Immigrants from Norway by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65

In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Lebanese (10.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Okinawan (10.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Italy (10.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Europe (10.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (10.4%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Sierra Leonean (10.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Guamanian/Chamorro (10.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Turkey (10.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Egyptian (10.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Iran (10.4%, a difference of 0.42%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Immigrants \| Italy	92.6 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 10.3%
Pakistanis	92.2 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 10.3%
Lebanese	92.0 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 10.3%
Okinawans	91.7 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 10.4%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	91.1 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 10.4%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	90.8 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 10.4%
Immigrants \| Iraq	90.7 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 10.4%
Immigrants \| Moldova	90.7 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 10.4%
Hmong	90.0 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 10.4%
Asians	89.9 /100 \| #124	Excellent 10.4%
Immigrants \| Philippines	89.4 /100 \| #125	Excellent 10.4%
Immigrants \| Hungary	89.1 /100 \| #126	Excellent 10.4%
Cambodians	89.1 /100 \| #127	Excellent 10.4%
Ottawa	88.5 /100 \| #128	Excellent 10.4%
Immigrants \| Iran	88.4 /100 \| #129	Excellent 10.4%
Immigrants \| Oceania	88.4 /100 \| #130	Excellent 10.4%
Egyptians	87.8 /100 \| #131	Excellent 10.5%
Immigrants \| Turkey	87.7 /100 \| #132	Excellent 10.5%
Guamanians/Chamorros	87.5 /100 \| #133	Excellent 10.5%
Sierra Leoneans	86.8 /100 \| #134	Excellent 10.5%
Immigrants \| Norway	86.5 /100 \| #135	Excellent 10.5%