Scottish vs Czechoslovakian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Scottish
Czechoslovakian
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Scottish
Czechoslovakians
9.2%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scottish vs Czechoslovakian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,624,089 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.668 and weighted average of 9.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,521,017 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 3.0%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scottish | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 4.2% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 44.2% |
| Range | 95.8% | 43.1% |
| Mean | 22.9% | 11.8% |
| Median | 12.3% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.4% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.5% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.5% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.3% | 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish and Czechoslovakians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Slovak (9.2%, a difference of 0.030%), European (9.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Swiss (9.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Thai (9.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and Luxembourger (9.2%, a difference of 0.75%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Latvian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), British (9.4%, a difference of 0.43%), Native Hawaiian (9.4%, a difference of 0.53%), Northern European (9.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and Finnish (9.4%, a difference of 0.83%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Slovaks | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Thais | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Welsh | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Irish | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Italians | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Finns | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Native Hawaiians | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |