Norwegian vs Immigrants from Pakistan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Norwegian
Immigrants from Pakistan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Norwegians
Immigrants from Pakistan
11.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Immigrants from Pakistan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,481,223 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,777,836 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.071 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 2.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Immigrants from Pakistan |
Minimum | 0.92% | 0.75% |
Maximum | 55.6% | 35.3% |
Range | 54.6% | 34.6% |
Mean | 12.7% | 11.0% |
Median | 11.1% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Immigrants from Pakistan by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Eastern European (11.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Italian (11.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and Swedish (11.6%, a difference of 0.76%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Immigrants from Greece (11.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Iran (11.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Singapore (11.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Cypriot (11.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and Danish (11.7%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |