Japanese vs Spanish American Indian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Japanese
Spanish American Indian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Japanese
Spanish American Indians
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
26.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
42.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
180th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Spanish American Indian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,508,626 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.662 and weighted average of 21.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,039,462 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437 and weighted average of 21.1%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Japanese | Spanish American Indian |
Minimum | 11.5% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 80.0% |
Range | 88.5% | 73.5% |
Mean | 28.5% | 26.4% |
Median | 23.4% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.9% | 15.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.3% | 29.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.9% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 16.7% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Spanish American Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Swiss (21.4%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are European (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), British (21.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Slovak (21.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |