Navajo vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Navajo
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Navajo
Chickasaw
30.2%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Navajo vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,099,770 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.465 and weighted average of 30.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,366,373 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 55.3%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Navajo | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 7.1% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 68.8% |
| Range | 92.9% | 63.7% |
| Mean | 39.7% | 24.3% |
| Median | 36.9% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.5% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 49.9% | 27.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 28.4% | 9.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.0% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.9% | 10.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Navajo by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Lumbee (31.0%, a difference of 2.5%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.1%, a difference of 4.0%), Pima (29.0%, a difference of 4.2%), Yuman (28.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and Tohono O'odham (31.7%, a difference of 4.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.2% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Liberian (19.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (19.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Vietnamese (19.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Cherokee (19.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Guyana (19.4%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |