Korean vs Luxembourger Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Korean
Luxembourger
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Koreans
Luxembourgers
13.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Korean vs Luxembourger Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,868,115 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Koreans and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 13.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,837,676 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 1.8%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Korean | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 54.8% | 37.5% |
| Range | 52.7% | 35.9% |
| Mean | 13.2% | 10.7% |
| Median | 12.2% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.5% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Koreans and Luxembourgers by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Italian (13.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Estonian (13.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Asia (13.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (13.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Greece (13.9%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Australia (13.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bolivia (13.6%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.6%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Scotland (13.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and Lithuanian (13.5%, a difference of 0.77%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Asians | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Croatians | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Estonians | 99.2 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Italians | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.1 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Poles | 98.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.1% |