Brazilian vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Brazilian
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Brazilians
Chickasaw
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
82.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,388,637 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,366,373 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 26.1%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Brazilian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.2% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 48.8% | 68.8% |
Range | 46.6% | 63.7% |
Mean | 16.3% | 24.3% |
Median | 14.3% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 18.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.3% | 27.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 10.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Brazilians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Icelander (15.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Peru (15.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Slovak (15.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and Slavic (15.4%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Albanians | 88.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 87.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.3% |
Peruvians | 87.2 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.3% |
Welsh | 87.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.3% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.3% |
New Zealanders | 86.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.3% |
Slavs | 84.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.4% |
Icelanders | 82.5 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Peru | 81.7 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.5% |
Slovaks | 81.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 80.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 80.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.5% |
Israelis | 80.1 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Liberian (19.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (19.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Vietnamese (19.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Cherokee (19.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Guyana (19.4%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.2% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.4% |
Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.5% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.5% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |