Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,776,906 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,366,373 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 28.5%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Southern Europe	Chickasaw
Minimum	6.5%	5.1%
Maximum	36.8%	68.8%
Range	30.3%	63.7%
Mean	16.9%	24.3%
Median	14.1%	21.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.1%	18.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	20.4%	27.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.3%	9.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.3%	10.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.1%	10.6%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Southern Europe by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Southern Europe are Mongolian (15.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Armenian (15.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Europe (15.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Canadian (15.2%, a difference of 0.22%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Pakistanis	91.7 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Brazil	91.1 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 15.1%
Czechoslovakians	91.0 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 15.1%
Palestinians	90.9 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 15.1%
Portuguese	90.6 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	90.3 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	90.2 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	89.7 /100 \| #129	Excellent 15.1%
Mongolians	89.5 /100 \| #130	Excellent 15.2%
Armenians	89.4 /100 \| #131	Excellent 15.2%
Canadians	89.1 /100 \| #132	Excellent 15.2%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	89.0 /100 \| #133	Excellent 15.2%
Native Hawaiians	88.7 /100 \| #134	Excellent 15.2%
Albanians	88.6 /100 \| #135	Excellent 15.2%
Immigrants \| Spain	87.3 /100 \| #136	Excellent 15.3%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Liberian (19.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (19.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Vietnamese (19.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Cherokee (19.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Guyana (19.4%, a difference of 0.49%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Spanish Americans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.2%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 19.3%
Guyanese	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 19.3%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.4%
Immigrants \| Guyana	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.4%
Vietnamese	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.4%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.4%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.5%
Liberians	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.5%
Cherokee	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.5%
Jamaicans	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.7%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #270	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| Liberia	0.1 /100 \| #271	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #272	Tragic 19.8%