Afghan vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Afghan
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Afghans
Chickasaw
16.2%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
52.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
172nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,458,786 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,366,373 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 20.5%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Afghan | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.6% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 48.0% | 68.8% |
Range | 46.4% | 63.7% |
Mean | 17.3% | 24.3% |
Median | 15.5% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 18.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.9% | 27.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 10.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Afghans by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Hungarian (16.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Colombia (16.1%, a difference of 0.26%), White/Caucasian (16.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and Uruguayan (16.1%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 66.4 /100 | #165 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 65.4 /100 | #166 | Good 15.9% |
Costa Ricans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 16.0% |
South Americans | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 16.0% |
Uruguayans | 54.7 /100 | #169 | Average 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 16.1% |
Hungarians | 52.5 /100 | #171 | Average 16.2% |
Afghans | 52.3 /100 | #172 | Average 16.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 52.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.2% |
Scotch-Irish | 47.1 /100 | #175 | Average 16.3% |
Lebanese | 45.9 /100 | #176 | Average 16.3% |
Ethiopians | 43.4 /100 | #177 | Average 16.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 42.3 /100 | #178 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Syria | 42.3 /100 | #179 | Average 16.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Liberian (19.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (19.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Vietnamese (19.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Cherokee (19.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Guyana (19.4%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.2% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.4% |
Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.5% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.5% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |