British vs Scottish Male Poverty
COMPARE
British
Scottish
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
British
Scottish
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Scottish Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,450,397 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 565,490,793 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.659 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 0.41%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | British | Scottish |
Minimum | 2.8% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 68.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 65.4% | 98.5% |
Mean | 16.5% | 21.6% |
Median | 10.4% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.0% | 20.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.0% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.2% | 22.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.0% | 22.2% |
Demographics Similar to British and Scottish by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Indian (Asian) (10.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Denmark (10.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Cambodian (10.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Jordanian (10.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Australian (10.4%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Immigrants from South Africa (10.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Egypt (10.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Romanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Australian (10.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Jordanian (10.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Sweden | 95.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | England | 95.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Northern Europeans | 95.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |