Immigrants from Iran vs Filipino Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Iran
Filipino
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Iran
Filipinos
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Iran vs Filipino Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 279,394,600 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iran and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,803,740 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148 and weighted average of 6.6%, a difference of 9.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Iran | Filipino |
| Minimum | 0.76% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 15.8% | 12.3% |
| Range | 15.0% | 10.4% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| Median | 5.6% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Iran and Filipinos by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iran are Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.36%), Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Thai (6.7%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 0.61%), Chinese (6.5%, a difference of 2.2%), Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and Immigrants from Ireland (7.0%, a difference of 5.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |