Croatian vs Filipino Family Poverty
COMPARE
Croatian
Filipino
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Croatians
Filipinos
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Filipino Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 374,582,342 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.422 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,803,740 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148 and weighted average of 6.6%, a difference of 10.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Croatian | Filipino |
Minimum | 1.8% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 28.1% | 12.3% |
Range | 26.3% | 10.4% |
Mean | 8.9% | 5.6% |
Median | 6.8% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 6.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians and Filipinos by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.75%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.96%), and Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Thai (6.7%, a difference of 0.57%), Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 3.6%), Immigrants from Ireland (7.0%, a difference of 5.0%), Bhutanese (7.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and Latvian (7.1%, a difference of 6.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |